Pitchfork wrote:Pitchfork: Is Sonic Youth working on any new material right now?
Thurston Moore: No, no. We kind of need to record a song for this Starbucks record that's coming out.
Moderator: Electrical-Staff
Pitchfork wrote:Pitchfork: Is Sonic Youth working on any new material right now?
Thurston Moore: No, no. We kind of need to record a song for this Starbucks record that's coming out.


same wrote:They've paid their dues. Let 'em make some money. They probably have bad backs and mouths to feed. I know plenty of cool people (who I would not say "Fuck this person" about) who do graphic design for a living and work on advertisements for huge corporations. How is this any different?

Itchy McGoo wrote:I would like to be a "shoop-shoop" girl in whatever band Alex Maiolo is in.

John C3 wrote:same wrote:They've paid their dues. Let 'em make some money. They probably have bad backs and mouths to feed. I know plenty of cool people (who I would not say "Fuck this person" about) who do graphic design for a living and work on advertisements for huge corporations. How is this any different?
It isn't. Fuck those people.

same wrote:John C3 wrote:same wrote:They've paid their dues. Let 'em make some money. They probably have bad backs and mouths to feed. I know plenty of cool people (who I would not say "Fuck this person" about) who do graphic design for a living and work on advertisements for huge corporations. How is this any different?
It isn't. Fuck those people.
Why?

While this is true, you gotta put food on your family.John C3 wrote:same wrote:John C3 wrote:same wrote:They've paid their dues. Let 'em make some money. They probably have bad backs and mouths to feed. I know plenty of cool people (who I would not say "Fuck this person" about) who do graphic design for a living and work on advertisements for huge corporations. How is this any different?
It isn't. Fuck those people.
Why?
I don't understand by what rationale a person who does advertising work for huge corporations can still be considered 'cool'. This is not a 'cool' thing to do.


John C3 wrote:same wrote:John C3 wrote:same wrote:They've paid their dues. Let 'em make some money. They probably have bad backs and mouths to feed. I know plenty of cool people (who I would not say "Fuck this person" about) who do graphic design for a living and work on advertisements for huge corporations. How is this any different?
It isn't. Fuck those people.
Why?
I don't understand by what rationale a person who does advertising work for huge corporations can still be considered 'cool'. This is not a 'cool' thing to do.


same wrote:John C3 wrote:same wrote:John C3 wrote:same wrote:They've paid their dues. Let 'em make some money. They probably have bad backs and mouths to feed. I know plenty of cool people (who I would not say "Fuck this person" about) who do graphic design for a living and work on advertisements for huge corporations. How is this any different?
It isn't. Fuck those people.
Why?
I don't understand by what rationale a person who does advertising work for huge corporations can still be considered 'cool'. This is not a 'cool' thing to do.
What do you do for a living that's so fucking righteous?
Believe me, there are kind people out there, who have a good sense of humor and good taste in art and music, who are intelligent, creative, decent human beings, and they just so happen to work for a design firm that takes up occasional bids from "evil" corporations to pay the bills. I know some of these people. They are cool. Believe me.

John C3 wrote:If Ian Mackaye did a Starbucks advert would you still think he was cool? He's paid his dues, right?

same wrote:John C3 wrote:If Ian Mackaye did a Starbucks advert would you still think he was cool? He's paid his dues, right?
I never thought Ian McKay was cool. He seems like kind of a preachy spaz and I don't like the bands he's been in.
I'm still curious to hear your profession.

John C3 wrote:Since you ask, when I work I work in libraries, institutions where the commodity is neither sold nor pushed and where only a disregard of the rules of sharing the commodity brings about an economic factor in the consumer's relation to the institution.

Users browsing this forum: benadrian, Brett Eugene Ralph, chumpchange, Exabot [Bot], Flannery, J. Burns, MSNbot Media, steve, total_douche, Yahoo [Bot] and 21 guests